Homepage Fill a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template
Content Overview

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document used within the United States Army to evaluate the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant. This evaluation report serves multiple purposes, including assessing an NCO's professional attributes, competencies, and overall potential for future assignments. The form is divided into several sections, starting with administrative data that captures essential information such as the NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID), rank, and unit details. It also includes a section for authentication, where the rater and senior rater provide their signatures and confirm their assessments. The performance evaluation section is particularly significant, as it encompasses various categories such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement, allowing for a comprehensive overview of the NCO's capabilities. Additionally, the form requires the rater to provide comments and insights that reflect the NCO's adherence to Army values and standards. The senior rater then assesses the NCO's potential compared to peers, further influencing career progression. Understanding the nuances of the DA Form 2166-9-1 is essential for both NCOs and their evaluators, as it plays a pivotal role in the Army's performance evaluation system.

Similar forms

  • DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is an evaluation report for a higher rank, specifically for staff sergeants. Similar to the DA 2166-9-1, it assesses the performance and potential of the individual being evaluated. It includes sections for administrative data, authentication, and performance evaluation, ensuring a comprehensive review of the NCO's capabilities.

  • DA Form 1059: The DA Form 1059 is used for academic evaluation reports. Like the DA 2166-9-1, it provides a structured way to assess an individual's performance, but focuses on their academic achievements during military schooling. Both forms emphasize the importance of performance metrics and feedback.

  • Indiana Transfer-on-Death Deed: This form allows property owners to ensure the seamless transfer of their estate to their chosen beneficiaries without going through probate. For more information, visit https://todform.com/blank-indiana-transfer-on-death-deed.

  • DA Form 67-9: This form serves as an officer evaluation report. It shares similarities with the DA 2166-9-1 in that it evaluates an officer's performance and potential. Both documents require input from raters and senior raters, and they highlight the importance of leadership and professional development.

  • DA Form 4856: The DA Form 4856 is used for developmental counseling. While it differs in purpose, it shares the common goal of providing feedback and guidance to soldiers. Both forms require documentation of performance and areas for improvement, fostering growth and accountability within the military structure.

Document Specifics

Fact Name Fact Description
Form Purpose The DA 2166-9-1 form is used for the NCO Evaluation Report specifically for Sergeants (SGT) in the U.S. Army.
Governing Regulations This form is governed by Army Regulation (AR) 623-3 and DA Pamphlet (PAM) 623-3.
Privacy Act Compliance The form includes a Privacy Act Statement as outlined in AR 623-3 to protect personal information.
Administrative Data Part I of the form collects essential administrative data, including the rated NCO's name, rank, SSN, and unit information.
Authentication Process Part II requires signatures from the rater and senior rater, ensuring accountability in the evaluation process.
Performance Evaluation Part IV assesses various performance metrics, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement.
Rated NCO's Acknowledgment The rated NCO must sign to acknowledge understanding of the report and the appeals process as specified in AR 623-3.
Senior Rater Assessment Part V allows the senior rater to evaluate the rated NCO's potential compared to peers, categorizing them as most qualified, highly qualified, qualified, or not qualified.

Things You Should Know About This Form

  1. What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

    The DA 2166 9 1 form is used to evaluate the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the Army, specifically for the rank of Sergeant (SGT). It provides a structured way to assess various aspects of an NCO's performance, professionalism, and potential for future assignments. This evaluation helps in making informed decisions regarding promotions, assignments, and career development.

  2. Who is responsible for completing the DA 2166 9 1 form?

    The form must be completed by the rater, who is typically the immediate supervisor of the rated NCO. The senior rater, who is usually one level above the rater, also reviews and signs the form. In some cases, a supplementary reviewer may be involved to provide additional oversight. Each of these individuals has specific responsibilities in assessing the NCO's performance.

  3. What information is required in Part I of the form?

    Part I of the DA 2166 9 1 form collects essential administrative data. This includes the rated NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID number), rank, date of rank, and unit information. Additionally, it requires the reason for submission, the period covered by the evaluation, and the rated NCO's email address. Accurate completion of this section is crucial for the evaluation process.

  4. What does Part III of the form cover?

    Part III focuses on the duty description of the rated NCO. The rater must provide details such as the principal duty title, duty Military Occupational Specialty Code (MOSC), and a description of daily duties. This section may also include areas of special emphasis and any appointed duties. Clear and comprehensive descriptions help convey the NCO's role and responsibilities.

  5. How is the NCO's performance evaluated in Part IV?

    Part IV evaluates the NCO's performance across several categories, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each category includes specific criteria that the rater assesses, indicating whether the NCO met the standard or did not meet the standard. Comments are encouraged to provide context and examples of the NCO's performance in these areas.

  6. What is the significance of the senior rater's comments in Part V?

    Part V allows the senior rater to provide an overall assessment of the NCO's potential compared to peers. The senior rater selects a box indicating whether the NCO is "Most Qualified," "Highly Qualified," "Qualified," or "Not Qualified." This evaluation is significant as it influences the NCO's future assignments and career progression. The senior rater may also list successive and broadening assignments to give context to the NCO's potential.

  7. What should the rated NCO understand about their signature on the form?

    When the rated NCO signs the form, they acknowledge that their signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the assessments made by the rater and senior rater. Instead, it verifies that the administrative data is accurate and that they have seen the completed report. The NCO should also be aware of the appeals process outlined in Army Regulation 623-3, should they wish to contest any part of the evaluation.

Documents used along the form

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, it is often accompanied by several other forms and documents that help create a comprehensive evaluation package. Understanding these additional documents can enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the evaluation process.

  • DA Form 2166-9-2: This is the NCO Evaluation Report for staff sergeants and above. It complements the 2166-9-1 by providing a framework for evaluating more senior NCOs, ensuring that their performance is assessed consistently across ranks.
  • DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It is used to document counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. This form captures important discussions about performance, goals, and areas for improvement, which can inform the evaluation process.
  • DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It provides crucial data regarding a soldier's physical readiness, which is a key component of their overall evaluation.
  • DA Form 5500: This is used to record body fat measurements for soldiers who do not meet Army weight standards. It is important for assessing compliance with physical fitness requirements and can impact evaluations.
  • DA Form 67-9: This is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for officers. While it focuses on officers, it provides valuable context when evaluating NCOs who may interact with or support officers in their duties.
  • Employment Verification Form: For verification of employment status, refer to the Employment Verification document resources to facilitate accurate confirmation of your current job details.
  • DA Form 638: This is the recommendation for award form. It documents achievements and accomplishments that may warrant recognition. Awards can enhance an NCO's evaluation and overall career progression.
  • DA Form 7500: This form is the Army Commander's Evaluation of a Soldier. It provides additional insights from a command perspective, which can be beneficial in understanding an NCO's performance in a broader context.
  • DA Form 11-2: This is the Army Training and Evaluation Program (ARTEP) form. It assesses training effectiveness and readiness, providing critical information that can influence an NCO's evaluation based on their training leadership capabilities.

Incorporating these forms and documents into the evaluation process ensures a well-rounded assessment of an NCO's performance. Each piece of documentation plays a role in painting a complete picture of the soldier's capabilities, achievements, and areas for growth. Understanding their purpose can significantly enhance the effectiveness of the evaluation process.

Da 2166 9 1 Preview

HQDA#:

Attachments Menu

NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)

For use of this form, see AR 623-­3 and DA PAM 623-­3 the proponent agency is DCS, G-­1.

SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

IN AR 623-­3

PART I ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

c. RANK

d. DATE OF RANK

e. PMOSC

f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND

g. STATUS CODE

h. UIC

i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION

j. PERIOD COVERED

FROMTHRU

YEAR MONTH DAY

YEAR MONTH DAY

k.RATED MONTHS

l.NONRATED CODES

m. NO OF ENCLOSURES

n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

PART II AUTHENTICATION

a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE

a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

a5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE

b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

c1. SUPPLEMENTARY

c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER

c3. RANK

PMOSC/

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

REVIEW REQUIRED?

(Last, First, Middle Initial)

 

 

BRANCH

 

 

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c4. COMMENTS

 

c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE

c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)

 

c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS

ENCLOSED?

 

 

 

 

 

 

(.gov or .mil)

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-­3.

d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL

LATER

LATER

LATER

d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE

d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

PART III DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)

a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE

b. DUTY MOSC

c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)

d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS

e.APPOINTED DUTIES

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:

Date:

b. Height:

Weight:

Within Standard?

(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile

c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

COMMENTS:

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

Page 1 of 2

APD LC v1.00ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

SSN (or DOD ID No.)

THRU DATE

 

 

 

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional

COMMENTS:

bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

 

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS:

Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS:

influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by

example Communicates.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS:

workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps,

Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the

profession.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.)

COMMENTS:

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE

 

i. I currently rate

NCOs in this grade.

 

COMMENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART V SENIOR RATER OVERALL POTENTIAL

a. Select one box representing Rated

b. COMMENTS:

 

NCO’s potential compared to others in the

 

 

same grade whom you have rated in your

 

 

career. I currently senior rate

 

 

NCOs in this grade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOST QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGHLY QUALIFIED

 

 

QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOT QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment (3-­5 years).

 

Successive Assignment:

1)

 

 

2)

Broadening Assignment:

 

 

 

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

 

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APD PE v1.00ES